assessments; (iv) refused to accept any of Yukos’ gives to satisfy the tax promises with other belongings; and (v) refused to hold off or forego the auction on the voting shares of YNG Despite the fact that Yukos had (pending a resolution of its lawful issues) by the time on the auction pleased Everything of its alleged 12 months 2000 legal respo

four. The issue whether the steps of Respondent must be considered as expropriations beneath the United kingdom-Soviet Little bit is transferred to the deserves phase of the arbitration. In reaction, Claimant has basically altered its story. As set out in Claimant’s Reply, Claimant now asserts that it had been the legal (or nominal) proprietor